Skip to main content

Samsung avoids the explosive elephant in the room

Samsung's big Galaxy Unpacked event in New York City was focused squarely on unveiling the new Galaxy S8, but there was a specter hanging over the proceedings: the explosive legacy of the Galaxy Note 7. 

The fate of the Note 7 is a topic Samsung hasn't been able to shake, as much as the company hopes its impressive new generation of products could make everyone magically forget about it. The scope of its failure was unprecedented, making the Samsung brand a punchline and raising questions about production standards and how much control we really have over our precious smartphones. 
So when Samsung's parade of executives took the stage today to show off the S8, many expected there'd be some mention of the device, if even only in passing, to put its legacy to rest. 
There was no mention of the Note 7. Nothing at all.
Sure, Samsung Mobile President DJ Koh was full of subtle, Note 7-referencing messaging, as he focused his opening statements on "important new beginnings" with "products that you trust," and Samsung's commitment to quality, safety and craftsmanship. 
But when he started talking about how the company had developed the S8 by "overcoming obstacles" and being "humble enough to learn for our mistakes," the time came for plainer talk. What obstacles and mistakes, exactly? 
Similarly, when exec Justin Denison presented some more of the S8's specs, he made no mention of the battery issues that plagued the Note 7 while touting the company's new eight-point battery safety check.  
You could argue that Samsung has addressed the issue enough to move beyond it with the Galaxy's next generation. The Note 7 was going to be a tricky topic no matter what and Samsung has reportedly learned from its mistakes. But mentioning it specifically was important because the phone's failure refuses to leave the news cycle. 
Just this week, news broke that the last Note 7s left in service (mostly holdouts in South Korea) will finally be shut down with a software update. But Samsung did announce it will sell refurbished versions of the recalled devices in the future. 
That effort is in part a response to environmental groups pressure to recycle the devices, which is in some sense noble, to be sure — but Samsung hasn't yet outlined how the rereleased phones will be altered to avoid the fate of the original run. There might be a fix in place, as the Note 7 handsets we spotted in Samsung's factory in South Korea suggest, but that remains a mystery until the company tells us more. 
So the Note 7 isn't really dead, and its final legacy hasn't been totally etched in stone. We didn't need Samsung to drag the S8's big day through the charred remnants of the past — that time will come when the Note 8 is announced later this year — but mentioning it directly would let us totally focus on the company's exciting future.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Internet providers in US say that they are not going to sell their consumers’ internet browsing history

Comcast Corp, Verizon Communications Inc and AT&T Inc said Friday they would not sell customers’ individual internet browsing information, days after the US Congress approved legislation reversing Obama administration era internet privacy rules. The bill would repeal regulations adopted in October by the Federal Communications Commission under former President Barack Obama requiring internet service providers to do more to protect customers’ privacy than websites like Alphabet Inc’s Google or Facebook Inc . The easing of restrictions has sparked growing anger on social media sites. “We do not sell our broadband customers’ individual web browsing history. We did not do it before the FCC’s rules were adopted, and we have no plans to do so,” said Gerard Lewis, Comcast’s chief privacy officer. He added Comcast is revising its privacy policy to make more clear that “we do not sell our customers’ individual web browsing information to third parties.” Verizon does not sell person
Post a Comment
Read more

The Galaxy S8's misplaced fingerprint scanner was probably a last-minute change

Ask anyone to tell you where a smartphone's fingerprint reader should be and, though the answers will vary, you'll never be told "off center, right next to the camera lens on the back." But lo and behold, that's exactly where Samsung plopped  its  fingerprint scanner on the new (and otherwise delightful) Galaxy S8. It's a perplexing decision if we consider it as a deliberate design choice, but reports ahead of the S8's launch, which now seem validated by the device itself, suggest that it was a last-minute alteration enforced by the slower-than-desired development of more ambitious technology. A March 13th report out of Korea lays it all out lucidly. Samsung, working in collaboration with Synaptics, had initially hoped to build the fingerprint sensing tech directly into the screen itself. "Samsung poured resources into Synaptics’ fledgling technology last year but the results were frustrating," an informed source is quoted as saying. "W
Post a Comment
Read more

The Freedom 251 isn’t dead, it’s returned as the Freedom 420 4G feature phone for Rs 420(6.48$)

As we’re all aware by now, the  Freedom 251 smartphone  turned out to be a sham. The makers of the smartphone, resellers to be precise, were unable to follow through on their promise of delivering a smartphone at Rs 251 to the Indian public. Practically speaking, building such a  smartphone was impossible  to begin with. The bill of materials alone would place the cost of the device at over Rs 1,000 and despite claims of unnamed “partnerships” and tax breaks under the Make In India initiative, it would have been impossible to bring down the price of the smartphone and the plan fizzled out. Reality struck a harsh blow to the company and it’s offices have since been shut down. The original owners have also quietly disappeared and at least one has been arrested. It now appears that the company never gave up trying. We’ve learned that the company, now under new management, has taken a more realistic approach to the problem and have come up with yet another outrageous, but less lud
Post a Comment
Read more